Functional neurologic disorder as a rare complication of dental local anaesthetics: two contrasting cases.

Adverse reactions to dental local anaesthetics are fortunately rare. However, when they occur, they can be severe and debilitating to the patient. Adverse reactions may be either prolonged anaesthesia, with or without dysaesthesia, or systemic reactions. Although these systemic reactions are commonly thought to be allergies, this is rarely the case. Much more commonly, these adverse systemic reactions are either cardiovascular or from the central nervous system. This paper describes two contrasting cases of functional neurologic disorder which illustrates the consequences and appropriate management. The responsibilities of the dentist who injected the local anaesthetic are outlined.

Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) administration in dentistry as an alternative to nitrous oxide sedation: a review and feasibility study.

Methoxyflurane (MOF) as an agent for dental sedation has been used safely in Australasia for decades. The drug is now licensed for relief of pain associated with trauma and is being used during several medical outpatient procedures in the stead of traditional intravenous agents for sedation in the UK. Our aim was to analyse the safety and feasibility of the introduction of MOF as a drug for dental sedation in the UK community setting and assess its environmental impact. A literature review was conducted for available studies and a research audit of medical histories of patients that received nitrous oxide sedation in the previous year was carried out to assess suitability for MOF administration. The published literature shows MOF to be a safe drug for administration in the dental environment and local patients receiving nitrous oxide sedation are medically suitable for MOF administration. The advantages of considering MOF sedation are its environmental benefit and patient acceptability.

Adverse effects of articaine versus lidocaine in pediatric dentistry: a meta-analysis.

Over the last few years, numerous reports have lauded the efficacy of articaine hydrochloride as a local anesthetic (LA) in dental procedures. Numerous studies have shown that articaine outperforms lidocaine in various aspects of dental treatment, leading to its widespread adoption in both adults and children. Despite the publications of comparative studies, there remains a dearth of systematic reviews examining the adverse effects of articaine versus lidocaine in randomized controlled trials. The aim was to assess the available research on the adverse effects of articaine and lidocaine in pediatric dentistry. A comprehensive search was conducted on Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared articaine with lidocaine in pediatric dentistry were included. Methodological quality assessment and risk of bias were determined for each of the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the strength of evidence for every research. A total of 333 studies were identified through electronic searches. After conducting primary and secondary assessments, eight studies were included for the final qualitative analysis. We found no difference in the probability of adverse reactions between articaine and lidocaine after treatment in pediatric patients (risk ratio (RR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.54-2.15), p = 0.83). However, a high heterogeneity was reported among the outcomes in the investigated studies (I2 = 57%), and the strength of the evidence was classified as "moderate" based on the GRADE approach. Besides, we found no significant difference in the probability of postoperative pain, postoperative soft tissue injury and edema between articaine and lidocaine in pediatric patients following treatment. There was moderate quality evidence suggesting no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between articaine and lidocaine when used for pediatric dental procedures.

Non-pain-related complaints of paediatric patients after dental treatment under general anaesthesia.

AIM: To investigate the prevalence, duration, and severity of non-pain-related complaints after dental treatment under general anaesthesia (DTGA) and to identify correlating factors from patient's characteristics and treatment. METHODS: Parents/caregivers of children treated under general anaesthesia were asked to fill in a dichotomous questionnaire during hospitalisation and the postoperative week. Several complaints were evaluated in relation to factors associated with dental treatment and general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity after DTGA is common. Patients and their parents should be informed about the possibility of experiencing mild to moderate complaints, and adverse events that may last up to 7 days.

A preliminary study on the assessment of pain using figures among patients administered with dental local anesthesia for mandibular third molar extraction.

The aim of this study was to clarify or determine any possible association between pain reports with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a figures based scale. This research was a preliminary study aimed at developing a new pain scale without any verbal description. Healthy Japanese patients aged 20 to 39 years who received anesthetic injections for mandibular third molar extraction at our department were enrolled. Regarding pain from dental local anesthetic injections, we recorded figures selected by participants (among options of a circle, triangle, square, bar, and cross), and VAS scores. Overall, 29 men and 31 women participated in the study. Pain caused by local dental anesthesia tended to remind both men and women of the triangle among the suggested figures. Furthermore, patients who chose a cross also reported higher VAS scores than those who chose other figures. Acute pain caused by local dental anesthesia was associated with triangles, and patients who selected a cross were associated with higher VAS scores. The results of this study provide clinicians with important information for dental practice, and could prove useful in developing new pain scales.

A survey on the safety of anesthesia management provided by dental anesthesiologists in Japan: a 5-year survey by the Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology.

OBJECTIVES: The Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology (JDSA) has conducted a survey on the safety of anesthetic practice provided by dental anesthesiologists. This report includes information on the incidence of life-threating events, which is necessary for evaluating the safety of dental anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective observational questionnaire-based survey. All 32 JDSA accredited training facilities participated in this study. The accredited facilities were requested to provide annual data on basic demographic information concerning anesthetic management during the 5-year period from 2014 to 2018, inclusive. Details regarding life-threatening events were also requested. RESULTS: During the survey period between 2014 and 2018, a total of 219,343 cases of anesthetic management (80,138 cases of general anesthesia, 127,819 cases of sedation, and 11,386 cases of monitoring) were reported by the 32 JDSA accredited training facilities. The overall incidence of life-threatening events occurring during clinical dental anesthesia was 2.14/10,000, while the incidence of anesthesia-related events was 0.96/10,000. No deaths arising from anesthesia-related events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first survey on clinical outcomes of dental anesthesia to be conducted. The survey results provide evidence supporting the safety of anesthetic management as performed by dental anesthesiologists. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study will provide a basis for benchmarking the safety of dental anesthesia not only in Japan, but also around the world.

Postoperative Epistaxis Following Dental Treatment With Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Sedation.

A 12-year-old Caucasian male undergoing a dental extraction for a grossly carious mandibular molar under inhalational sedation with nitrous oxide/oxygen experienced an episode of anterior epistaxis postoperatively that was controlled well with local measures. Epistaxis following inhalational sedation with nitrous oxide/oxygen in the dental setting is a very rare complication but has been previously reported in the literature. This case report provides a review of the existing literature regarding cases of epistaxis associated with inhalational sedation using nitrous oxide/oxygen and discusses the potential etiology of epistaxis associated with inhalational sedation. Patients at higher risk of epistaxis should be properly informed of the risks prior to inhalational sedation with nitrous oxide/oxygen, and dentists should also be familiar with epistaxis management in the dental setting.

Sedative and adverse effect comparison between oral midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation in tooth extraction: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Oral midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation were commonly used sedative and analgesic techniques during tooth extraction. It is still controversial whether oral midazolam can replace the nitrous oxide inhalation for sedative and analgesic treatment of tooth extraction. Therefore, we conducted this study in order to provide a reference for doctors to choose effective sedative and analgesic treatment in tooth extraction. METHODS: We searched the Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and VIP information databases. RESULTS: Through this meta-analysis, we found that the success rate of sedation and analgesia treatment with oral midazolam during tooth extraction was 75.67% and the incidence of adverse reactions was 21.74%. The success rate of sedation and analgesia treatment using nitrous oxide inhalation during tooth extraction was 93.6% and the incidence of adverse reactions was 3.95%. CONCLUSION: The use of nitrous oxide inhalation for sedation and analgesia during tooth extraction is very effective, and oral midazolam can be used as an alternative to nitrous oxide inhalation.

A Patient with Known Allergy to Local Anesthesia Presenting for a Dental Restoration.

Dentists should be equipped to treat an allergic reaction in a dental office, and in this scenario, the potential allergic reaction is noted after administration of a common local anesthetic lidocaine with epinephrine. The allergic reaction quickly escalates to a full-blown anaphylaxis, and the management of such an episode is detailed in this article.

Observational and descriptive analysis of broken dental needles: a case series.

PURPOSE: To discuss potential causes of broken dental needles during dental anesthesia and features of this complication, including the anatomical location of fragments in tissues, symptoms, complications, and therapeutic approaches. METHODS: Twelve cases of broken dental needles occurring during dental anesthesia and subsequently referred to Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brazil, between 1992 and 2019 were selected. In addition, similar cases reported in the literature over the past 50 years were reviewed. RESULTS: Needle fractures occur most frequently during inferior alveolar nerve blocks and in younger patients. The leading cause is unexpected patient movement during the anesthetic procedure. The needle fragment is most commonly found in the pterygomandibular space or the deep spaces of the head and neck region. Needle migration is a particular concern; although rare, it is unpredictable and potentially life-threatening. CONCLUSIONS: Needle fracture is an intraoperative complication which has the potential to cause severe patient damage. It is essential that practitioners have knowledge of this possible complication and understand the technical considerations for its prevention. The existing literature and the results of this case series analysis suggest that removal of the fractured needle fragment should be attempted as soon as possible.

Pediatric morbidity after oral surgery procedures under general anaesthesia: A systematic review.

The aim of this study is to carry out a systematic review of the existing literature on postoperative morbidity after general anaesthesia (GA) in the dental care of paediatric patients, its frequency, characteristics and association with the intervention performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An exhaustive search of the literature published up to 23 February 2022 was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and EBSCO, with the following strategy: (infant OR child OR adolescent) AND (Oral Surgical Procedures OR Dentistry, Operative) AND Anesthesia, General AND Postoperative Complications. RESULTS: The most frequent reason for the indication of general anaesthesia was dental caries and its complications (up to 91.0% of patients), followed by lack of cooperation/anxiety and/or fear for dental procedures in the office (between 39.8 and 47.9%). There is a higher prevalence for treatments in the special patient group reaching 87.7% compared to 63.3% in healthy patients. The main comorbidities recorded were: physical or mental disability, neurological, haematological, cardiac disorders, asthma, Down's syndrome; it was not possible to establish their association with the intervention performed. Regarding complications, complaints occurred between 43.0 and 98.9% of cases within the first 24 hours, the main reason being pain (between 14.0% and 95.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric dental procedures under GA carry a very low risk of major complications, but have a virtually universal incidence of minor complications.

[Aspiration test as dental anesthesia safety criterion]. / Aspiratsionnyi test kak kriterii bezopasnosti obezbolivaniya v stomatologii.

Intravascular anesthetic injection can lead to acute toxic reaction even the minimal dose of the drug was administered. The aspiration test is a generally accepted standard for local anesthesia in medicine, specially designed to reduce the risk of emergency conditions. Medical instruments should be adapted for aspiration test, the local anesthetic carpule should have a retention notch, and the dental syringe plunger need to have retention elements. The aspiration test protocol may vary. For legal protection of the doctor the aspiration test result should be described in the patient's medical record.

Broken needle: a rare complication of inferior alveolar nerve block - a report of two cases.

Introduction Needle fracture during the delivery of local anaesthesia is a rare complication in modern dentistry. While there has been a decline in its occurrence with the advent of disposable flexible alloys, it still occurs and it is important for all clinicians to know how to deal with this complication. The management of a lost needle in the pterygomandibular space when giving an inferior alveolar nerve block has proven a dilemma in the past. In this paper, we discuss how to minimise the risk and the relevant management of such a scenario while examining two cases of needle fracture while delivering an inferior alveolar nerve block.Discussion There are a number of structures present in the pterygomandibular space of which all clinicians should be cognisant. Should a needle fracture and cannot be removed immediately by the clinician, prompt maxillofacial referral is required for further management.Conclusion While rare, needle fracture can occur while delivering an inferior alveolar nerve block and all clinicians should be aware of how to minimise the risk and how to manage such a complication. If it cannot be removed at the time, a prompt maxillofacial referral should be made.

Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The administration of local anesthesia (LA) in dental practice requires an injection which is the leading cause of patients' fear and anxiety. Computer-controlled local anesthetic injector, designed to reduce the pain of performing local anesthesia by controlling the speed of injection. This single-blind randomised control trial aimed to compare the pain perception after computer-controlled local anesthesia (CCLA) and conventional LA. METHODS: Dental students were both test and operator group versus an experienced dentist as additional operator of the LA. Data were collected regarding gender, age, medical condition, smoking habits. Additionally, operator feedback about the handling, pain at insertion and during infiltration, excitement (Dental Anxiety Scale), and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 60 included participants, the majority were females (n = 41; 68.3%), medically healthy (n = 54; 90%), and did not receive medications (n = 54; 90%). While the participating students administered 62 (51.7%) injections, the experienced dentist administered 58 (48.3%) injections. The difference in pain perception on puncture between CCLA and conventional injections was not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.285); however, pain perception during injection was significantly different (Sig. = 0.029) between CCLA (1.65 ± 1.93) and conventional injections (2.49 ± 2.31). CONCLUSION: The professional experience influenced the pain perception while applying the LA. CCLA did not reduce pain on puncture significantly; however, pain perception during the injection was significantly reduced in the case of using CCLA devices compared to the conventional syringe.

Factors Associated with Prolonged Exposure to General Anesthesia During Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia In Patients Under Age Three Years.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of prolonged general anesthesia (GA) for pediatric dental patients and understand factors that contribute to prolonged GA in patients under age three years in an academic hospital. Methods: A retrospective chart review for pediatric dental patients treated using GA collected data for patient age, treatment provided, other services involved in patient management, and case GA length. Further chart analysis was completed by a multidisciplinary team for cases of prolonged general anesthesia. Results: A total of 114 cases were evaluated. The incidence of prolonged GA exposure was 21.9 percent (N equals 25). Cohort data of cases younger than three years show that cases of prolonged GA exposure were more likely to be closer to age three, require longer non-throat pack time, require more restorative procedures, require longer procedure times, and utilize additional surgical services more often (P<0.05). Four common themes for prolonged exposure were identified (significant restorative needs, provider-level training, anesthesia complications, and utilization of other services), with most cases (88 percent) experiencing multiple themes as contributing factors. Few adverse effects were noted, and none had long-lasting effects. Conclusions: Dental rehabilitation cases in very young patients are at risk for prolonged exposure to GA. Providers should be aware of total anesthesia time while completing dental rehabilitation using GA and proactively attempt to reduce the risk of prolonged exposure.

Effects of throat packs in upper airway surgery under intubation anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Throat packs (TP) are used in upper airway surgery to avoid accumulation and aspiration of blood, foreign bodies, and fluids. But side effects such as sore throat and TP retention have been reported and challenge the standardized use of TP. The aim of this study is to compare benefits and side effects of TP versus no TP for upper airway procedures in intubation anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients with surgical interventions at the upper airway under intubation anesthesia were included. Of those, n = 74 each were treated without (A, control) and with (B) TP. Study group B was subdivided whether TP was placed by the surgeon (B1; n = 37) or by the anesthesiologist (B2; n = 37). TP-related side effects such as sore throat, foreign body sensation, hoarseness, dyspnea, difficulty of swallowing, nausea, retching, nausea, aspiration, and pneumonia as well as the influence of TP design and the applicant (surgeon or anesthetist) were analyzed. RESULTS: A significantly increased rate of difficulty of swallowing (p = 0.045), intensity of sore throat (p = 0.04), and foreign body sensation (p = 0.024) was found in group B when compared to group A. There was no correlation between hoarseness, dyspnea, nausea, retching, and TP. No case of aspiration or pneumonia was seen but one TP was accidentally forgotten in the patient. B2 showed an increased frequency of difficulty swallowing, followed by A and B1. B1 led to the highest incidence of nausea followed by the A and B2. CONCLUSION: The use of TP led to a high rate of side effects without showing the propagated advantages. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of TP must be considered critically and cannot generally be recommended without specific reasons, such as high aspiration risk.

Developing a Classification System for Prioritizing Pediatric Dental Patients Needing Treatment under General Anesthesia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore a classification system for children requiring full-mouth dental rehabilitation (FMDR) in the operating room (OR) and its association with adverse events. METHODS: Patients treated at a pediatric dental residency clinic and determined to need FMDR in the OR were classified on initial examination, based on the extent of caries, pain and the presence of a dental abscess. On the treatment date, parents were given a questionnaire concerning adverse events that occurred while waiting for treatment. Χ2 tests of independence were used to determine associations between classification (OR code) and the occurrence of adverse events. The Pearson's r test was used to determine relations among adverse events and wait time. RESULTS: The study included 82 patients (age range 2-10 years, mean 4.73 years, median 4 years). The average wait time was 55.6 days. The most common OR classification was caries in the outer third of dentin without pain or abscess, and the most common adverse event was difficulty eating or drinking. The OR code category most closely associated with negative outcomes was the presence of a dental abscess, followed by caries depth, then pain. Wait time was not associated with the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence to support the need for a classification system for children requiring FMDR in the OR. Dental abscess, caries depth and pain were associated with adverse events.

Perioperative Dental Injury Associated With Intubated General Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: Factors related to perioperative dental injury have likely changed as a variety of airway devices and preventive measures have been introduced. This retrospective chart review used data from an institutional registry to evaluate the incidence, timing, and contributing factors of patient self-reported dental injury and to assess the impact of dental injury on patient satisfaction. METHODS: Multivariate logistic analysis was performed on the records of 14,820 patients using the incidence of dental injury as the dependent variable and covariates in the anesthesia registry and a postoperative questionnaire as independent variables to investigate factors significantly associated perioperative dental injury. In addition, satisfaction with the anesthesia service was compared between patients with and without injury using a matched-pair population. RESULTS: A total of 101 dental injuries were identified. Of those, 25% were associated with intubation and extubation in the operating room, while most other injuries occurred postoperatively. Duration of anesthesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.03) and emergency surgery (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.11-3.30) were independently associated with perioperative dental injury. Dental injury did not significantly decrease a patient's satisfaction with the anesthesia service (P = .441). CONCLUSION: Most perioperative dental injuries are unrelated to anesthesia procedures. However, the duration of anesthesia and emergency surgery were significantly associated with perioperative dental injury, while decreased patient satisfaction was not.

Pain Experienced during Various Dental Procedures: Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Traditional Syringes with the Controlled-Flow Delivery Dentapen® Technique.

Background and Objectives: Currently, one of the most discouraging aspects for many patients undergoing dental procedures is the administration of anaesthesia. Consequently, there is a constant search for new techniques to avoid the invasive and painful nature of the injection. A new motorised syringe system (Dentapen®) has recently been developed, standing out for its convenience and ease of use. Material and Methods: Randomised, controlled, single-blind, and single-centre study including 178 voluntary adult participants aged between 18 and 90 years. Individuals were randomly assigned using a randomised table. Patients were asked to rate the level of pain experienced during the injections, using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). The following data were recorded: pain index, heart rate, blood pressure, and saturation, both before and after anaesthesia. Results: Of the total 178 participants, 87 participants (48.9%) were men and 91 (51.1%) were women. The first variable to be assessed was the pain experienced by patients when anaesthetised with a syringe, obtaining a mean value of 2.63 ± 1.86 on the VAS with the conventional syringe and 1.06 ± 1.28 with the Dentapen® syringe, showing statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.01). When stratifying, based on the procedure that was undertaken, differences were also significant for all treatments (p-value < 0.01) except for endodontics, where differences were likely to be significant (p-value = 0.02). Conclusions: In conclusion, from a clinical standpoint, the Dentapen® syringe is a valid alternative to traditional infiltration syringes, causing minimum pain with the injection.